Whoever is elected US president on 8 November will be a war president from day one. It will have the power and autonomy to show the power, d...
Whoever is elected US president on 8 November will be a war president from day one. It will have the power and autonomy to show the power, drone attacks, special operations and increased military intervention. Nowadays sending combat troops routinely published by the PR's, the decision to support "partners" Saudi Arabia in Yemen is published through press releases and the debate in Congress is mainly down to the fact that legislators are praying for more troops and more lenient rules of engagement. And most of it probably feels pretty good, Hillary Clinton, says "Foreign Policy". Unlike Donald Trump, who constantly changes his positions and has alleged secret plans to defeat Islamic State, Clinton has a long history, from which they can assess its position. By many criteria, it can be characterized as a hawk, writes "Foreign Policy". Good understanding of military doctrine Clinton so far has been a narrow circle of people who have decided on a lot of military operations, such as those in Haiti, Bosnia and Afghanistan. In addition, four were on duty US Secretary of State. She has developed a very close cooperation with retired military officials, such as General Jack Keane. Journalist Bob Woodward in 2009, described the meeting of the Clinton and China, "Clinton welcomed China big bear hug. You should know that Hillary is rarely so embracing." Many military officials testify that the Clinton regularly communicated with representatives of the US military in Islamabad and Kabul. They say it was the best prepared interlocutor that is well understood military doctrine and acronyms Pentagon. In November will be known whether the United States, a country that is at war over the past 15 years, to keep a woman who has extensive experience with the American military system. This is seven important things that had to decide whether to support the use of American military force. Croatia - 1991. and Bosnia and Herzegovina - 1992. Claims about the horrible massacre at Srebrenica are very fit the Clinton administration, the Bosnian Muslim leaders, as well as Croatian authorities that it was necessary to draw attention away from the devastating ethnic cleansing of Serbs from western parts of yugoslavia. Clinton officials rushed to the scene of the Srebrenica massacre to publish, just as the US diplomat William Walker did in Racak, in Kosovo, in order to induce NATO intervention. "Many Muslim officials have claimed that their leader Alija Izetbegovic said that he had informed Clinton that the US would intervene only if the Serbs killed at least 5,000 at Srebrenica." Abandoning Srebrenica before 11 July 1995 by armed Bosnian Muslim forces that were vastly outnumbered the Serbian striker, provided a death toll that has exceeded the threshold Clinton set, whereby the losses in manpower victim considered necessary in order to achieve a higher goal Efficient killers In Bosnia, with the help of the Clinton Administration, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, brought more than 4,000 mujahideen, says Edward Herman and explains: "They were efficient killers whose activities, along with other Muslim paramilitary and regular forces, left havoc in hundreds of Serbian villages, with many thousands killed. The media, however, the ethnic cleansing in Bosnia presented as one-sided with the genocidal intent, although in comes to the battle for control of the territory. " Rwanda - 1994 Role of clinton's administration in Rwanda was never fully explained. Wha is known is that Clinton administration refused to characterize this crime as genocide. Instead of genocide, they use term mass crimes and later massacre. Serbia / Kosovo / FYROM (macedonia) - 1999. WHEN the repeated terrorist actions in Kosovo and Metohija in late 1997 and early 1998, it was clear that they were Albanian separatists could not run without the tacit support and indirect financial assistance from the West. Without knowledge of the intelligence services of some leading countries in the West, primarily the United States and Germany, touching the large amounts of money and weapons to Kosovo and Metohija would not be possible. These services have registered but have not been effectively prevented a major drug trafficking organized by the Albanian narcotics, whose entire proceeds went to the purchase and smuggling weapons to Kosovo and Metohija. The collapse of the so-called. financial pyramids in Albania, for which it is not known whether it was unprovoked or directed, and the implosion of that country in 1997 enabled the mass looting of warehouses with weapons, and they soon found themselves in the hands of Albanian terrorists in Kosovo and Metohija. Unclear is whether the transition Arms Army of Albania into private hands was indeed due to helplessness of the authorities to prevent the removal of weapons from military depots or power Sali Berisha, the former president and fiery advocate of the separation of Kosovo and Metohija from Serbia and Yugoslavia, it staged to Albanian terrorists in Kosovo and Metohija allow impunity to seize large quantities of arms and ammunition to terrorist attacks and subsequent armed rebellion. The threat of force However, the United States and its Western allies have been able to resolve the Kosovo and Metohija outside internationalize, via the Contact Group and the UN Security Council, and destabilize the inside, with the help of increased terrorist activities of the KLA. Created the situation is favorable to Mr Milosevic and the FRY impose talks on Kosovo and Metohija under US, ie. Albanian conditions. Using the threat of military intervention by NATO, Ambassador Holbrooke negotiated a truce between the content of our armed forces and the terrorist KLA, and many observers of the OSCE mission, under surveillance, and the leadership of the ambassador and other US intelligence officer John Walker supervised the conduct of participants in armed conflict on the ground. The result of these operations was that Milosevic was twice their hands tied. On the one hand, he could not go all the way into liquidation and neutralizing terrorist KLA, because they protect the truce, on the other hand, he had no guarantee that terrorists, since they recover from previous bumps and fill the ranks of the newly mobilized Albanians will not re-possessed pacified areas and roads. This double clamp, which the United States tightened Milosevic and Yugoslavia, together with the double standards towards terrorism and demonization unprecedented levels of everything that is Serbian, led in early 1999 to type the talks in Rambouillet and Paris, where they can envy and former Nazis because they were overcome in width pressures, coercion and threats by armed force and amount of cynicism that everything is done in the name of peace and humanitarian values. In fact, the US, under the umbrella of NATO, had already decided on the air attack on Yugoslavia and practiced such an operation, a farcical talks in Rambouillet and Paris should only have to give the excuse that they are all peaceful and political means were exhausted. Nobody better explained and admitted than the main advocate and architect of armed aggression against the FRY, former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, when she was invited western mediators in the talks that "Milosevic set such a high bar for required not to be able to skip the" . One of its earlier predecessors as Secretary of State Henry Kissinger was more explicit and principled claiming, after the failure of the Rambouillet talks, that the conditions and requirements in the secret annex to the Rambouillet document offered were such that no sovereign country would not be able to accept. Blood trails The Clinton administration wanted the war and not peace with the FRY and everything she did and did not do this come true. No matter what is said about Milosevic's tardiness, errors and omissions in connection with Kosovo and Metohija, he then, against the US Knocking Down a hawk, he had no choice but to defend the country from the programmed aggressor. All the explanations that he could avoid war by accepting the whole package of documents from Rambouillet, falling to the fact that the life of every sovereign country there is a minimum below which self-esteem not to go. Everything below this minimum ceases to be freedom and sovereignty and becomes capitulation and occupation. The war that is the only superpower planned to lead and gain against the FRY was no humanitarian intervention, but was the result of imperial interest in, breaking the only remaining independent military force in the Balkans, the region, through which will go a planned oil and gas pipelines from the Caspian basin the Adriatic sea is placed under tight military and political control. How is this interest was imperative active and confirmed by the firm commitment of the United States and other NATO countries to massive air operation against the FRY perform regardless of the Statute of NATO, which does not give authorization for military operations outside the established area of ??responsibility, the lack of necessary and express authorization from the Council security Council and violated the UN Charter and fundamental principles of international law. Fully illegal almost three months in the mass bombardment of the FRY has been promoted at the expense of the right forces and the forces of law applied huge blow to the very foundations of international relations and the role of the UN as the only authorized guardian of peace and security in the world. The Iron Heel NWO left the first traces of blood. Message to all states and peoples who dare to stand in the way of vital interests and values ??of the United States and other NATO countries was short: if the weather does not bow down and incline, you will pass as the FRY and Serbs. PROMISE OF AMERICA Although it is not publicly put forward, the United States Albanian terrorists in exchange for cooperation to destabilize Milosevic and the FRY, bar tacitly pledged support for the secession of Kosovo and Metohija from Serbia, with the prospect of subsequent abandonment of the FRY, which would in the meantime been or is loose konfederalizovana. Therefore, its agents in Paris and Rambouillet did all that because the agreement is so broad and flexible to leave the city for the further evolution of Kosovo and Metohija towards independence. "Kosovo is a paradise for criminals, and the capital of drugs and human trafficking. The KLA, which has a long relationship and receives help from Al Qaeda, helped the rebellion in Macedonia and continues to fight for its goal of 'Greater Albania'. On top of that the West turns his head with occasional general indication of the success story ". Haiti - 1994. 1994. Clinton first support, later, opposed the intervention in Haiti in order to re-establish government Bertrand Aristide. As the historian Taylor Branch wrote in his interviews with Bill Clinton: "I asked him what he thought Hillary. He said he dar-mar that originated the invasion was a crazy idea for her." It was then making shrewd former first lady, the options developed by the US military were not overly convincing and often logistically impossible to implement. Fortunately, the invasion of 25,000 US troops was avoided after Jimmy Carter negotiated the agreement at the last moment with Raul Cedras who ensured that he would step down. Iraq - 2002. As a senator of New York, in 2002, Clinton voted to authorize the use of military force in Iraq. She supported the war in which both went then-President George W. Bush, but said that it was a message to Saddam Hussein that the country is unique. Having defended from the start position for which he voted, he later adapted it a bit and said that he "thought it was a vote to return to the inspectors," a "was based on facts and guarantees that I had at that time" and, finally, "it was a mistake to believe Bush". Clinton also defended his vote, saying that "believes in diplomacy of force" in the presidential debate in January 2008. Pakistan - 2007. and 2008. 2007 and 2008, Clinton did not agree with the views of then-Senator Barack Obama of strikes on Al Qaeda targets in Pakistan. Obama said that such attacks "just common sense". Clinton referred to the rocket in 1998 that failed to kill Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan and warned that "we must be aware of all the consequences," especially anything that would destabilize the nuclear arsenal Pakistan. Obama later authorized the 407 drone attacks in Pakistan that killed 3089 people. Nearly 300 of these attacks happened while Clinton was the Secretary of State, and in that time, US diplomats opposed to just one or two such attacks. Whatever the hesitations of the Clinton once had in attacking missions in Pakistan, it was gone after she became Secretary of State. Afghanistan - 2009. 2009. Clinton has supported three quarters request for additional troops in Afghanistan. Namely, when General Stanley McChrystal, commander of US forces in Afghanistan, has requested four additional brigades of American troops in the summer of 2009, the Clinton approved three brigades (roughly 30,000 soldiers). Apparently advocated sending more troops than Secretary of Defense Gates wanted writes "FP". Obama was eventually sent an additional 33,000 troops. It is difficult to define what is time in political and security terms received. In addition, more than three quarters of all US troops killed in the country since September 11 were killed or wounded in the four years after they arrived, and additional troops. Libya - 2011. 2011. Clinton was a loud proponent of regime change in Libya (and Donald Trump). Today it is forgotten that the primary justification offered by the US military role in Libya was payback allies in the war in Afghanistan. As she said at the end of March 2011: "We asked our allies, our NATO allies, to start with us in Afghanistan 10 years ago. They were there, and many of them have been there despite the fact that they are not attacked ... When it comes on Libya, we heard from our copula in the UK, France, Italy and other NATO allies. This was in their vital national interest. Obama is properly marked unplanned post-war scenarios as the "worst mistake" and accurately described Libya as a "mess". Syria - 2012. Clinton in 2012, allegedly submitted to the White House, along with the head of the CIA David Petraeus conduct a secret program that would provide assistance to Syrian rebel groups fighting against the Bashar al-Assad. Obama opposed the proposal because there was no guarantee where they would have ended at the end, a CIA analysts were not entirely convinced that this would lead to the removal of Assad from power no matter the costs. It is difficult to assess the effectiveness of the CIA's program in relation to the major efforts the ministry of defense, but the fact is that the rebels supported by the United States did not have excessive success against Assad, who now support the Russian Air Force. Less
